I’m trying to create a tension between realism and abstraction. My goal is to create a painting that is in line with the work of the abstract expressionists. I’m trying to make paintings that are paintings first and landscapes second-to make paintings that just so happen to look like a landscape.

In the best case I begin my paintings on location, the energy and ideas come from being out in nature. I finish them in the studio away from the distraction of all the details and stimulus of being out in nature. In the studio I can focus on them as paintings first and representations of a place second. Sometimes they remain fairly true to the spot that inspired them, sometimes they change dramatically. I start by responding to the location–to something outside of the canvas-and at some point there’s a shift that happens and I’m responding to and energized by what is on the canvas.

It’s the ebb and flow between nature and painting that keeps me interested. At times I can get a bit too representational or precious, I’ll notice that I’m standing too close to the painting or holding the brush too far down. Other times I get too abstract or separated from what inspired me initially. In both cases I lose interest–it gets boring. Joy and energy are found in the space between realistically representing the spot and abstracting it into a new thing with its own composition and color relationships and energy.